Unexpected Controversy Erupts Over Rep. Gallego’s Surprising Endorsement

Rep. Gallego’s endorsement from a key police organization attracts ire from progressive factions, raising questions about his stance on police reform.

At a Glance

Rep. Ruben Gallego receives Arizona Police Association endorsement.
Gallego criticizes DOJ’s findings on Phoenix Police Department.
Progressive groups and ACLU condemn the timing and content of his letter to the DOJ.
Gallego emphasizes isolated incidents, seeks local reform.

Gallego’s Endorsement from the Arizona Police Association

The Arizona Police Association (APA) endorsed Rep. Ruben Gallego for his U.S. Senate race, a significant move as the APA previously supported Trump and Kari Lake. Gallego’s involvement with federal legislation to boost police hiring and retention played a crucial role in securing the endorsement. However, this endorsement has led to backlash from progressive groups who feel it undermines efforts for police accountability.

Arizona Police Association President Justin Harris praised Gallego’s legislative support, linking it to the need for a collaborative approach to law enforcement reform. Harris noted, “As a Marine combat veteran, we know Congressman Gallego understands the complexities of modern policing in American society today, while at the same time recognizing the public’s expectations.” Despite this commendation, progressive factions view the endorsement as a betrayal of broader police reform goals.

Gallego’s Stance on DOJ’s Investigation

Just a day after receiving the endorsement, Gallego sent a letter to the DOJ criticizing their findings regarding the Phoenix Police Department. The DOJ investigation had highlighted a pattern of excessive force and bias. Gallego argued that these violations were isolated incidents, countering that reforms should be handled locally rather than federally imposed. He expressed concerns over the potential costs and staffing issues a DOJ consent decree might incur.

Progressive Backlash and Defense

Progressive groups, including the ACLU of Arizona and Poder In Action, sharply criticized Gallego’s timing and the content of his letter. Critics argue that his position signifies a rollback on police accountability and reform initiatives, implying a possible quid pro quo for the APA’s endorsement. Gallego’s campaign denies these allegations, maintaining that the letter’s timing was coincidental and unrelated to the endorsement.

Phoenix Law Enforcement Association’s decision to post Gallego’s letter on Facebook provoked further scrutiny, intensifying the progressive backlash. This reaction underscores the delicate balance candidates must strike between various supporter factions during campaign seasons.

“The APA does not take our endorsements lightly; we recognize the importance of having a U.S. senator that can bring people together to improve society for all,” said APA President Justin Harris. This quote highlights the significant weight the APA places on its endorsements.

Gallego’s Rebuttal and Future Implications

Standing firm, Gallego expressed pride in his endorsement, emphasizing his dedication to Arizona’s law enforcement. “I am proud to have the APA’s support and look forward to working with them in the Senate to ensure Arizona’s law enforcement officers have the resources necessary to combat fentanyl trafficking, train the next generation of officers, and, above all, keep Arizona families safe,” he stated.

As the campaign continues, Gallego seeks to balance his appeal to moderate and independent voters in Arizona, recalibrating his stance to showcase broader support. With civil rights advocates and progressive groups watching closely, Gallego’s next steps will be pivotal in determining his political trajectory and broader implications for Arizona’s law enforcement policies.