California Governor Gavin Newsom’s selective silence on three devastating Los Angeles mass shootings exposes the dangerous hypocrisy of a politician who weaponizes tragedy for political gain while ignoring inconvenient victims.
Story Highlights
- Newsom remains conspicuously silent on three major LA-area mass shootings that don’t fit his gun control narrative
- The governor’s selective outrage reveals a pattern of exploiting tragedies for political advancement rather than genuine public safety
- California’s strict gun laws failed to prevent these shootings, undermining Newsom’s anti-Second Amendment agenda
- Conservative voices are exposing the governor’s calculated silence through social media campaigns
Newsom’s Calculated Media Strategy
Governor Gavin Newsom has built his national political brand on dramatic responses to mass shootings, positioning himself as America’s foremost gun control advocate. His theatrical press conferences and emotional appeals have become signature moves in his quest for higher office. However, three significant Los Angeles-area mass shootings have received notably muted responses from the governor, raising questions about his selective engagement with public safety crises.
The Inconvenient Truth About California’s Gun Laws
California maintains some of the nation’s strictest gun control measures, championed by Newsom as models for federal legislation. The state requires background checks for all firearm sales, maintains assault weapon bans, and implements red flag laws that Newsom frequently promotes. Yet these three LA-area shootings occurred despite this comprehensive regulatory framework, demonstrating the fundamental flaw in the governor’s approach to public safety.
Political Opportunism Over Genuine Leadership
Newsom’s career trajectory reveals a pattern of leveraging high-profile moments for political advancement rather than substantive problem-solving. His response to mass shootings typically involves immediate media appearances, calls for federal gun control, and positioning California as a national leader. The selective silence on these three incidents suggests his engagement depends more on political utility than genuine concern for victims and public safety.
Conservative Pushback Gains Momentum
Conservative voices across social media platforms have begun highlighting Newsom’s conspicuous silence on these shootings, using the governor’s own rhetoric against him. The phrase “Silence Is Violence,” often used by progressive activists, has been turned back on Newsom to expose his selective outrage. This grassroots campaign demonstrates growing frustration with politicians who exploit tragedy for personal gain while ignoring inconvenient facts that undermine their narratives.
Silence Is Violence: Here Are Three LA-Based Mass Shootings Gavin Newsom Doesn't Want You to Know About https://t.co/DD6JBsqXNl
— Jennifer Van Laar (@jenvanlaar) August 28, 2025
The governor’s silence on these three LA shootings represents more than political calculation—it reveals the dangerous consequences of prioritizing ideology over effective governance. Americans deserve leaders who address all public safety threats consistently, not politicians who cherry-pick tragedies to advance their careers and attack constitutional rights.
Sources:
Democratic Governors Association
National Governors Association
