How Trump Skipping Debate with Harris Could Alter Political Norms

Person speaking at podium with crowd behind them.

Donald Trump’s decision to forego further debates with Kamala Harris raises questions about the future of election traditions and campaign strategies.

At a Glance

  • Donald Trump refuses to participate in additional debates with Kamala Harris.
  • Historical precedent for no further debates since 1980 with Reagan and Carter.
  • Kahala Harris argues for the necessity of another debate due to election significance.
  • Public and political figures, including Taylor Swift, show support for Harris.

Trump’s Debate Decision

Donald Trump has ruled out any further debates with Vice President Kamala Harris leading up to the upcoming election. Trump argued that he clearly won their initial encounter and dismissed further debates as redundant. This decision breaks away from the norm of engaging in multiple presidential debates as traditionally facilitated by the Commission on Presidential Debates.

The refusal to debate again evokes the 1980 election scenario where no additional debates occurred after the initial meeting between Ronald Reagan and Jimmy Carter.

The decision has sparked discussion across political circles, with reactions both supporting and opposing Trump’s approach. Harris has emphasized the importance of engaging in further debates to address critical national issues and provide voters with a comprehensive understanding of the candidates’ positions.

Responses and Impact

Kamala Harris, after facing Trump, insisted that another debate would serve the public’s interest, highlighting the upcoming election’s gravity. Polls following the debate showed Kamala Harris might have had an edge, encouraging her push for a rematch.

“Donald Trump has ruled out another presidential debate against his rival Kamala Harris before November’s election. He said on Thursday – two days after the pair’s first showdown in Philadelphia – that Harris only wanted a rematch because he ‘clearly’ won.”

Former President Trump criticized the moderators and denied the need for further debates, citing bias and an alleged agenda against him. While some view this strategy as playing safe, arguing it solidifies Trump’s base, Harris has received significant support, particularly from public figures like Taylor Swift, potentially influencing younger voters.

Implications for Future Campaigns

Trump’s decision to avoid further debates embodies a larger strategy focusing on direct communication with his supporters, sidelining traditional debate formats. The decision not to debate could influence upcoming presidential campaigns, particularly regarding how candidates engage with each other on national platforms.

“When a prizefighter loses a fight, the first words out of his mouth are ‘I want a rematch’,” Trump wrote in a lengthy Truth Social post on Thursday. “Polls clearly show that I won the debate against comrade Kamala Harris, the Democrats’ radical left candidate… and she immediately called for a second debate,” he added.

This departure from traditional debate customs adds a layer of unpredictability to the current electoral landscape, emphasizing a strategic choice that might redefine future electioneering norms.

Sources

1. Trump rules out another presidential debate against Harris

2. Donald Trump declares he won’t do second presidential debate with Kamala Harris; ‘When a prizefighter loses a fight…’