The deployment of a so-called sonic weapon during a recent US military raid in Venezuela has raised eyebrows and stirred controversy among global observers.
Story Highlights
- Eyewitness claims US used a “sonic weapon” in a raid to capture Venezuelan President Maduro.
- Reports suggest around 100 Venezuelan soldiers died with no US casualties reported.
- The White House shared the story, amplifying its reach despite lack of official confirmation.
- The operation underscores US technological superiority, despite skepticism about sonic weapon use.
Eyewitness Accounts Stir Controversy
An anonymous Venezuelan security guard claims that during a US raid on January 3, 2026, US forces deployed an unidentified “sonic weapon,” causing severe injuries and deaths among Venezuelan soldiers. The operation, aimed at capturing President Nicolás Maduro, was reportedly supported by drones and helicopters, with approximately 100 Venezuelan deaths and no US casualties. The alleged weapon caused symptoms resembling severe internal distress, including nosebleeds and vomiting blood, raising questions about US military capabilities.
Despite the dramatic account, US officials have not confirmed the use of such a weapon. The report has gained traction following its amplification by White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt on social media, sparking widespread debate and speculation. Critics question the credibility of the eyewitness, noting the absence of physical evidence or corroboration from other sources.
Operation Absolute Resolve and Strategic Implications
The raid, dubbed Operation Absolute Resolve, highlights ongoing tensions between the US and Venezuela under Maduro’s regime. The US has long sought regime change, citing concerns over socialism and alliances with adversaries like Russia. By capturing Maduro, the US aims to destabilize his government and assert its influence in the region. The operation also underscores the technological superiority of the US military, utilizing precision strikes and advanced drones to achieve its objectives with minimal risk.
While the claim of a sonic weapon remains unverified, it aligns with known US capabilities in directed-energy technologies, such as microwaves and lasers. These technologies have been developed for years to incapacitate targets without visible damage, echoing reports from global conflicts like the Ukraine-Russia war. However, the use of such weapons in Venezuela remains speculative, with critics warning against the potential for misinformation and fearmongering.
Political and Global Repercussions
The raid’s impact extends beyond Venezuela, sending a clear message to other Latin American nations about the US’s willingness to intervene and assert its dominance. In the US, the operation has sparked political debate, with figures like Senator Marco Rubio defending the action as necessary for regional stability. However, some lawmakers express concerns about the raid’s legality and the lack of congressional oversight, calling for further investigation.
Mysterious 'sonic weapon' used by US military in Venezuela: Report https://t.co/j1OE6T101D pic.twitter.com/0VDNra965A
— American Military News (@AmerMilNews) January 13, 2026
Globally, the raid may prompt an arms race in directed-energy technology, challenging existing military balances and eroding trust in traditional defense systems. As the story unfolds, its implications for US foreign policy and military strategy will likely be scrutinized, with potential repercussions for international relations and security dynamics.
Sources:
US used sonic weapon on Venezuelan troops, report shared by Leavitt claims
Did the US use a sonic weapon in Venezuela? Report sparks debate
U.S. kamikaze drones look to have been used in strikes on Venezuela
