Federal agents say a Florida-licensed attorney walked into a Mississippi gun store, vowed to kill immigration agents, and tried to buy a gun and pepper spray the next day she was arrested.
Story Highlights
- Homeland Security Investigations arrested Lisa C. White after alleged threats at a Mississippi gun shop.
- Witnesses reported she asked if bullets could pierce agents’ body armor and said she would aim for the head if not.
- Officials say she tried to buy a firearm and pepper spray during the encounter.
- Prosecutors are pursuing a federal charge for threats against federal officials, with penalties up to 10 years.
Alleged Threats Inside a Mississippi Gun Store
Homeland Security Investigations, a unit within Immigration and Customs Enforcement, arrested attorney Lisa C. White on September 24, 2026, one day after a reported incident at High Caliber Guns in Long Beach, Mississippi. An agent’s complaint says White entered around 11:30 a.m., said she needed a gun, and described herself as a protester and activist. Store staff reported that she threatened to kill federal immigration agents during the exchange.
Witness accounts in the complaint say White pointed to her torso and asked if bullets could go through an agent’s ballistic vest. When told body armor stops rounds, she allegedly said she would aim for the head, shoulder, arm, or leg. Officials say she also tried to buy pepper spray during the visit. The store notified the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, which referred the case to Homeland Security Investigations.
How the Case Moved From Shop Floor to Federal Court
Investigators interviewed the gun store owner and staff after the referral and then arrested White the next day. Authorities announced a federal charge for influencing, impeding, or retaliating against a federal official by threat. Reporting cites a possible penalty of up to 10 years in prison and a fine up to $250,000. Local outlets identified the location, time, and statements as described in the federal complaint filed by a named investigator.
News reports say the case centers on threats against agents of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. Immigration and Customs Enforcement called the language “explicit threats” to kill federal agents and said the threats came as she was seeking a firearm. That detail matters for prosecutors because it links violent words to steps toward acquiring a weapon, which can suggest intent and target focus in court filings.
Why This Matters Beyond One Arrest
Threats against front-line officers put real people at risk and strain trust in basic law and order. Conservatives and liberals both worry about rising anger, uneven justice, and a sense that the system protects insiders. When an attorney is accused of targeting federal agents, it reinforces a broader fear that our civic rules are breaking down and that sharp political fights are spilling into threats of real violence, which endangers families and communities alike.
At the same time, the First Amendment protects heated political speech unless it becomes a “true threat.” In 2023, the Supreme Court said prosecutors must show the speaker had at least a reckless awareness that their words were threatening. That standard aims to punish real threats while guarding speech, even when it is crude or harsh. Context, intent, and conduct all matter in that legal test.
What to Watch Next in the Legal Process
Next steps include court review of the complaint, any indictment, and detention decisions. Judges will look at the words used, the setting, the reported effort to buy a weapon, and the focus on a specific class of federal officers. The reported referral chain from the store to the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives and then to Homeland Security Investigations shows a standard handoff from retail incident to federal probe.
Florida attorney Lisa White charged after walking into a Mississippi gun shop and saying she needed a g*n to k*ll ICE agents.
⠀
White, 70, of Diamondhead told employees at High Caliber Guns in Long Beach on September 23 that she was an activist and protester who needed a firearm… pic.twitter.com/1ZOLQXUHri— Newyorker4ever (@zingari888) October 22, 2026
For citizens who feel the system serves the powerful first, this case cuts both ways. People want strong action when officials are targeted. They also want even rules that protect speech and punish real violence, not political enemies. The courts must weigh the facts and apply the law. Clear, public outcomes help rebuild trust that justice is not partisan and that threats against anyone in public service will meet a firm, fair response.
Sources:
pjmedia.com, wlox.com, thepostmillennial.com, knoe.com
